"She wrote in language which is still relevant, if not to the abolition of slavery, certainly to our attitude to the climate crisis."
Leslie Wilson is the author of two novels for adults and three for young adults. Last Train from Kummersdorf was shortlisted for the Guardian Children's Fiction Prize and the Branford Boase Award; Saving Rafael was nominated for the Carnegie Medal and Highly Commended for the Southern Schools Book Award. The first two deal with Nazi Germany: The War’s Not Over Yet is published as a Kindle e-book and is set at the time of the Russian blockade of Berlin in 1948. Leslie Wilson is half German, was brought up bilingual, and has spent considerable amounts of time in Germany.
1809: A forty
year-old woman hears of a bull-baiting that is to take place in Bonsall, in
Derbyshire. Appalled, she gets herself to Matlock, two and a half miles
distant, tries to get local dignitaries to stop the event. They refuse. By the
time she gets back to Bonsall the bull is already tied, and the dogs about to
be released. The crowd has been drinking for hours; bets have already been
placed. The woman speaks to the crowd, appealing to them to give up their
entertainment. She has no success. So she tries something else. She manages to
find out who is the bull’s owner and buys the animal from him. The bull is
saved.
In carrying out
this action, Elizabeth Heyrick transgressed against the approved behaviour of
women at this period; she shouldn’t have been at such an event at all, let
alone interfering with the pleasures of men. The story demonstrates her courage
and determination, which was to be further manifested through the rest of her
life.
She was born in 1769,
into a middle-class, dissenting family with radical tendencies. Attractive and
elegant, she fell in love with John Heyrick, a descendent of the poet Robert
Herrick, and married him at the age of nineteen. The marriage turned out badly.
Heyrick, though idealistic, was also a gambler and had a violent, unstable
temperament, for which Elizabeth blamed herself, though her family blamed her
husband (her brother even challenged Heyrick to a duel because of his treatment
of his wife, but nothing came of it).
They spent several periods apart and there were no children. In 1797, she
came back from church to find him dead on the floor from a fatal heart attack.
This dreadful shock
precipitated her into a period of depression and self-starvation, but she had a
supportive family, no financial troubles (though she donated her Army widow’s pension
to charity), and a circle of engaged, intelligent female friends, some of whom
were Quakers. Though she continued to suffer depression, she found a role in
life: campaigning for the oppressed.
Heyrick herself
became a Quaker in 1807 (two years before she prevented the bull-baiting) and also
probably taught for a while in a Quaker school for girls in York. Quakers were
then in what is known as the ‘quietist’ period, and it was rare at this stage
for outsiders to become convinced, so Elizabeth was exceptional in this respect
also. However, quietism must not be understood as inactivity. Though Quakers
had owned slaves in the past, and many of them through their business
activities had been connected with the profits of slavery, uneasiness about
slavery grew throughout the eighteenth century and in 1772, the American
anti-slavery campaigner John Woolman had convinced the London Yearly Meeting of
Quakers to include an abolitionist statement in the Epistle which was sent out
to British Quakers after that national meeting. Subsequently many British
Quakers became dedicated anti-slavery activists, and briefed campaigners such
as William Wilberforce.
Women were also
permitted to minister during the silent Meeting for Worship, and many of them (including
two of Heyrick’s friends) were ‘recorded’ as ministers, which doesn’t mean that
they became paid ministers or led the Quaker meeting; simply that they were
recognised to have a calling to stand up and speak in the largely silent
Meeting. Though women did play a subsidiary role within the Society of Friends,
they nevertheless had far more opportunity to speak and be heard than in many
other denominations; certainly more than the Church of England, which did not
allow women to speak at all. For a woman like Heyrick, the Society of Friends
could be seen as a natural home.
She became the
author of eleven hard-hitting pamphlets; against animal cruelty, against social
injustice in Britain, and against slavery (these all written in the 1820s).
The slave trade
was abolished in the same year that Elizabeth became a Quaker, but chattel slavery
was not. It was argued that if the trade was abolished, slave owners would be
kinder to their enslaved workers, and even that abolition would come about
gradually (Heyrick regarded this idea as propaganda on the part of the
planters, who were certainly good at protecting their interests). She wrote in
language which is still relevant, if not to the abolition of slavery, certainly
to our attitude to the climate crisis.
‘The slave-holder
knew very well, that his prey would be secure, as long as the abolitionists
could be cajoled into a demand for gradual instead of immediate abolition. He
knew very well, that the contemplation of a gradual emancipation, would beget a
gradual indifference to emancipation itself. He knew very well, that even the
wise and the good may, by habit and familiarity, be brought to endure and
tolerate almost any thing.’
She was never a
woman to pull punches. She wrote: ‘We that hear, and read, and approve, and
applaud the powerful appeals, the irrefragible arguments against the Slave
Trade, and against slavery, - are we ourselves sincere, or hypocritical? Are we
the true friends of justice, or do we only cant about it? – To which party do
we really belong,’ – to the friends of emancipation, or of perpetual slavery?
Every individual belongs to one party or the other; not speculatively, or
professionally merely, but practically. The perpetuation of slavery in our West
Indian colonies ... is a question in which we are all implicated.’
During the 1820s,
women became increasingly active in the campaign to abolish slavery, and formed
their own societies, in which Elizabeth was active. Her pamphlets were, of
course, read by the members of these societies. One of the issues which
particularly concerned them was the sexual abuse of enslaved women; ‘moral
degradation’ was the word used;
it was of its time, but everyone knew what it meant. ‘I have known them gratify their brutal passions,’ the
freed man Olaudah Equiano writes about the white captors, ‘with females not ten
years old.’
Meanwhile, the national Anti-Slavery Society, with its male
membership, was still sticking to the aim of gradual abolition. Eventually, the
women had enough. Prior to the Gentlemen’s
Anti-Slavery Society’s annual meeting, they said they would donate £50 (equivalent
to around £3,300 today) to that society if they were willing to give up their
use of the word ‘gradual’ in their aims. The women’s contribution to the
outcome was never (are we surprised?) mentioned, but the society did indeed
give up the word ‘gradual’, in spite of objections from William Wilberforce.
Elizabeth died in
1831, before the 1833 Act was passed which abolished slavery in all British
dominions. She would have been outraged at the payment of compensation to the
plantation and slave owners, a sum which has only recently been paid off by
British taxpayers, but which has enriched many a British family. ‘The slave has
a right to his liberty,’ she wrote, ‘a right which it is a crime to withhold –
let the consequences to the planters be what they may.’
Exceptionally
among white anti-slavery campaigners, Elizabeth Heyrick regarded the enslaved
people as equals, regardless of skin colour. She defended the uprisings against the
planters, regarding them as justified; she denounced floggings and cruel
punishments, both in the West Indies and in Britain. She spoke out for a decent
living wage for the working classes. Through careful research and an exciting
access to a preserved archive, Jocelyn Robson has opened up for us the life of
an extraordinary and precious woman. She is to be congratulated.
Elizabeth Heyrick: the making of an anti-slavery campaigner is published by Pen and Sword History.
|
Photograph by Corinne Lambert |
Recently, sculptor Corinne Lambert was commissioned to make this piece,
Abolition (Remembering Elizabeth Heyrick) which is now in the permanent collection at Leicester Museum and Art Gallery. The presentation was covered by BBC Leicester - read the piece
here.