Guest review by Graeme Fife: THE ROMAN TRIUMPH by Mary Beard

 

"Beard’s book offers at least an inkling into an answer … never the answer, and that is the mark of an outstanding historian and communicator."

Graeme Fife is a regular reviewer here. He has written many plays, stories, features and talks for radio, stage plays and articles for newspapers and magazines, and is a regular contributor to BBC Radio 4's From Our Own Correspondent. He's the author of a string of books - children's stories, biography, works of history and fiction. His novel of the French Revolution, No Common Assassin, tells the story of Charlotte Corday. His new novel, Memory's Ransom, a compelling wartime story, is published by Conrad Press.

Mary Beard is deservedly celebrated for the way she brings to life the ancient world by plucking what might seem trivial information from inscriptions, the treasure trove of artifacts, what one might call ‘the unconsidered trifles'.

This study of one of the most egregious customs of the Romans is an essential insight into the workings of those people, their Empire, the way it was acquired and held, by law, language and brute force. The parallels with later empires, like them or despise them, are obvious.

The Triumph was all about show, an adjunct of political power. Words filling out that conceit spring immediately to mind: fame, from the Latin word for being talked about (an infant is so called because he or she cannot talk); glory – from their word for boasting; ambition, which meant walking round but it hides the purpose of walking round which was canvassing support ... Julius Caesar, of aristocratic birth, doing the populist thing by walking the streets of the poorer district of Rome and his Gallic Wars - how many parts is Gaul divided into ...? Oh, come on, it starts the whole history and copies of those war despatches were widely distributed as political flyers. He was self-advertising and wildly successful at it.

For the triumph - not lightly awarded – the conquering general, imperator, entered Rome with his army (in normal times no army was permitted to enter Rome: that counted as belligerent sedition) and a gaggle of captured slaves, carriages laden with booty ... it was bringing the glory of conquest home to the central hub, Rome. Interesting that in Latin the word for to or towards, ad (advent, address etc), is not used with two words: home and Rome.

Beard launches her fascinating study of this phenomenon of high-style propaganda, with the words of Seneca, tutor to Nero: ‘Petty sacrilege is punished; sacrilege on a grand scale is the stuff of triumphs’. Given what many men of power, political or financial, do these days, doesn’t this ring so horribly true? Seneca was being mildly cynical, of course, but he was telling the truth and not everyone bought into the whole lookatme lookatme schtick.

One of the best known advertisements of the Triumph may be Caesar’s triumphant return from swift victory over an upstart king (any warlord who opposed Rome was an upstart) in 47 BC. His despatch with the same words had already reached the Senate but they were used again, painted on boards, to impress the people who thronged Rome’s streets in their thousands to watch the parade: Veni vidi vici. Those three snappy words in a way encapsulate his appeal: he wasn’t messing around, he got on with the job. For example, the procession ended with the ascent of the Capitoline Hill to the Temple of Jupiter. ‘Julius Caesar,’ writes Beard, ‘is reputed to have climbed the stairs to the temple on his knees in a gesture of humility’. Pure showmanship: as if to underline that he was one of them, the ordinary people, the voters.

Placards, cardboard cut outs, the soldiers singing bawdy songs about their general - to avert the jealousy of the gods because their general, riding in a chariot, his cheeks raddled in imitation of the father of gods and men, rode with a slave whispering ‘Memento te mortalem’ ‘remember you are human’ that is not a god … as if.

So much of it was sham: in modern terms, the TV celebrity masquerading as a leader. Suetonius in his Lives of the Caesars says that the emperor Caligula (named by his father’s soldiers when he was a child with them on campaign – the word means ‘little marching boot’) drew up his army on the beach of the Channel and told them to fill their helmets with sea shells, the ‘spoils’ for his intended triumph over the waters of the sea.

Beard writes with brisk energy and insight. At the heart of this fine investigation into how show is connected to political ambition and the overweening desire to own, to conquer, in the words of one of today’s greatest political shams to be king of the world, is her lucid scholarship and the ability to question herself in her inquiry as much as the commentators on the actual event on whom she must rely. She says: ‘Why on earth did the Romans do it? Why did they invest such time, energy and expense in this ceremony? Why?’

Purification? Glorification? Symbolic capital …?

Beard’s book offers at least an inkling into an answer … never the answer, and that is the mark of an outstanding historian and communicator. For there never really is a full stop, only ever a hanging comma on which we sit as on a swing in a secret garden.

The Roman Triumph is published by Harvard University Press